If you are unaware of what a bird dog actually is, here is a definition I found from Investopedia.
In our case scenario Bart and Alan boot reside in Boring, Oregon. In Contract law a reward offer is binding.
In Property law a person has a responsibility to return lost personal property to its rightful owner.
The finder made a concerted effort to locate the owner by taking out an ad n the local newspaper in the lost and found section of the classified section. The founder responded to the ad stating that he was in possession on the lost pocketbook.
He was told that he needed to return the pocketbook or he would be arrested for larceny. The finder returned the pocketbook and sued for the reward that the owner placed on the return of the pocketbook.
It makes no difference in eyes of the law if the property was found first or if the reward was advertised first. The reward was for the return of the lost property and not for the actual finding of the object.
In return for the watch, the owner offered a reward. A young boy found the watch and gave it to his father to return to the owner. The father contacted the owner to arrange the exchange of the watch for the reward. The owner refused to honor the reward so the father of the finder refused to return the watch.
The court found that the finder was entitled to keep the lost property until the reward was given. In McFarland, the court ruled that the finder of lost property has a lien against the property if a reward is offered.
Once the owner offers a reward they are obligated to pay the finder for the lost property.
They cannot use the ruse of a reward as bait and then threaten criminal charges for the return of the property. In this case as well as our case there was a reward offered and the finder is entitled to receive it as long as they return the lost property.
As in the Wentworth case, the court upheld that a Real Property Finders and Rewards By Shoelaces promise tort a reward must be paid tort the return tot lost property. The owner remised a reward for the return of his watch and when the finder presented the property for payment of the reward the owner refused.
The finder would not return the watch as he now had a lien on the property. The finder prevailed since he was within his legal right to demand the reward.
Alan is entitled to the reward for the return of the pocketbook to Bart. The law does not care if the reward was offered before or after the lost property was found, but the reward is a promise for compensation for the return of the item.Adverse possession, sometimes colloquially described as "squatter's rights", is a legal principle that applies when a person who does not have legal title to a piece of property—usually land (real property)—attempts to claim legal ownership based upon a history of possession or occupation of the land without the permission of its legal owner..
In general, a property owner has the right to.
Trying to find a roommate is a headache, but websites like Roomi, Padmapper and Craigslist can help. These are the nine best roommate finders on the web. Here are our latest work from home jobs and ways to earn extra cash, hand-picked from across the Internet. We post new leads every day except Sunday and holidays, so be sure to bookmark this page and check back daily.
6 THE AIPP / RICS / RDE GUIDE TO BUYING A PROPERTY IN SPAIN The Colegio Nacional de Registradores de España, usually shortened to Registradores de España, is the Spanish Registrars Association.
We are a public and legal body, bringing together all the Land and. PROPERTY OUTLINE Be concerned with facts, holding, and policy. Note, applies to both personal property and real property. Reasons: 1.
Prior possession protects an owner who has no sign of ownership. Possession is not the same as ownership. Protecting a finder who reports the find rewards . [back] Pedophilia The Pedophocracy. by David McGowan. The Pedophocracy, Part I: From Brussels The Pedophocracy, Part II: to Washington The Pedophocracy, Part .